Which technique is NOT typically used to generate alternatives in problem solving?

Critiquing is not a method used for generating alternatives in problem solving but rather a process employed to evaluate or assess existing ideas or options. It involves analyzing the strengths and weaknesses of various alternatives after they have been generated. The goal of critiquing is to refine ideas and facilitate better decision-making by highlighting potential issues or areas for improvement.

In contrast, techniques such as brainstorming, mind mapping, and decision matrices are explicitly designed to foster the creation of new ideas and alternatives. Brainstorming encourages free-flowing thoughts where participants can propose as many ideas as possible without judgment. Mind mapping visually organizes ideas to explore connections and relationships, thereby sparking further creativity. Decision matrices help in systematically evaluating the alternatives that have been generated based on specific criteria, thus supporting more informed selections. Therefore, the focus of critiquing on evaluation sets it apart from the primary aim of generating alternatives.